Public Works and Your Business
I recently took the opportunity to go to the public open day walk through of the completed initial stage of the City Rail Link tunnels. A very impressive feat of engineering and good for the future growth of the city.
The open day was of particular interest to me because of my involvement in the project as the lawyer representing a number of landowners along the route adversely impacted by the works.
Our clients were affected in a number of different ways; some losing their homes, others having to relocate their businesses, to make way for the construction of the rail tunnels and surface stations.
The compensation negotiations with Auckland Transport were often highly stressful for our clients and compensation outcomes were hard fought and hard earned.
The clients that had land taken, leases terminated, and businesses relocated, were in some respects better off than those left behind.
In particular, I am thinking of the business owners in Albert Street, Karangahape Road and Symonds Street, where construction of the City Rail Link has the potential to continue to cause major disruption to business operations due to loss of customer access, visibility, parking and shading, all caused by the new structures and construction works .
Similar to compensation regimes in other countries, the Public Works Act 1981 offers little in the way of meaningful compensation for these owners.
Section 63 of the Act states that:
“(1) Where substantial injurious affection to a person’s land is caused by the construction (but not the maintenance or operation) of a public work… … … and there would be a right of action at common law in respect of the injurious affection… … … the Crown or Local Authority shall compensate the person to such extent as the injurious affection warrants.”
This section 63 right of compensation is seldom used and there is very little, if any, judicial interpretation of how it should be used and applied.
I recall assisting landowners on the City Rail Link route back in 2014 who had businesses (both landlords and tenants) close to planned railway stations. Those businesses faced 3-5 years of disruption, with carparks likely to be required for construction equipment and use as operational headquarters. In addition, 3-5 years disruption to pedestrian and vehicular traffic, all potentially reducing the desirability of their business sites as a destination for customers. In other parts of New Zealand valuable retirement village developments end up adjacent to 110 kph expressways and apartment blocks are threatened by flyovers constructed metres from their residential accommodation.
Back in 2014, all Auckland Council and Auckland Transport were prepared to consider regarding the City Rail Link was some targeted rates relief.
I recall at that time, one business owner told me they had been forced to relocate without compensation when the
Council did some relatively minor stormwater drainage works in Vulcan Lane, Auckland City central. Imagine then (came the comment) what the loss of business would be resulting from a four-billion-dollar railway project. The proof of this can be seen in the drop off in business for commercial operations in the Albert Street area.
Very late in the process the Government has stepped in by proposing ex gratia hardship payments for some Albert Street businesses most severely impacted by the works. There is significant doubt that this last minute offer of funds will be enough to adequately compensate for loss.
The time is overdue for a major overhaul of the Public Works Act to make it fairer and easier for compensation to be sought and awarded to the people left behind, not just the taxpayers who have land expropriated by the government agency for the public work.
If you have concerns about the impact of a public project on your property or business, do not hesitate to contact me at any time on 021 485 557.
Your Land Compensation Specialist
“I have used Turner Hopkins for my legal services for over eight years. I have always found their level of service excellent and their work to a very high standard. I have used various lawyers at their firm for various businesses I have been involved with and have always had very positive experiences. I would highly recommend them.”
“I have struggled with different legal firms over the years, but over the past few years I have engaged with Turner Hopkins with various requirements from personal relating to wills, family trust, property settlements and contracts through to commercial engagements including employment advice, commercial lease agreements and general legal advice. I have engaged with a number of the people in the firm and always found them professional, punctual in their responses and very sound in the advice provided.”
“To Michael Robinson – I wanted to thank you and your colleagues for many years of excellent service to the Bank. You have an outstanding business that has proved to be one of the most reliable and ethical businesses that Collections have dealt with in the almost 9 years I was with the Bank.”
“John is very easy to talk to, he never makes you feel dumb, and never makes you feel like you are wasting his time for asking questions. He explains everything very clearly, every time. John's support staff are also very efficient and so easy to deal with. No detail is missed when dealing with them. My husband and I are fans of them all :)”
“Joy, we cannot thank you enough for your help with our purchase! You have been wonderful to deal with and so proactive (and patient with my numerous emails). We will be visiting NZ in April so will make sure we drop in to thank you in person.”