Immigration Policy Changes Related to Culturally Arranged Marriages
As we head into an election year, we can expect some interesting debate across the political spectrum within the immigration space; not least from the NZ First party, which is often vocal in this area. Labour and its coalition partner have clearly been at odds recently over policy relating to culturally arranged marriages – an emotionally charged subject for large sections of our community.
A directive from Immigration New Zealand earlier this year saw the pathway for partners who had undergone a culturally arranged marriage but had not lived together (for any length of time), severely curtailed. INZ assess relationships on the basis of whether they are ‘genuine and stable’, with a number of factors being relevant to this – not least, time spent living together.
Given the cultural complexity surrounding marriage – what is, and what is not possible – it is not always possible for a married, or betrothed couple to live together for any length of time prior, or even directly after the marriage (due to offshore work commitments etc).
Therefore, to allow for this type of scenario, INZ had previously issued Visitor Visas to spouses of NZ residents or citizens, to allow them entry to NZ to start living with their partner; these could then be converted to work and residence visas over the course of time. However, given a visitor visa is essentially just for the purpose of a visit (and a long term or permanent stay was the intention), in these cases, the visas were issued as an exception to policy.
It was INZ’s directive to stop allowing the exception in these circumstances that sparked controversy and protest, especially in the Indian community, which was significantly affected by this policy shift.
But, as we have seen recently, with intervention at the highest levels of government, this strict interpretation of policy has been walked back some way. This has resulted in the amendment of current policy to cater for many of those affected and INZ will be re-visiting a large number of declined applications. If you believe you have been affected or would like to know your options, please give us a call.
“I have used Turner Hopkins for my legal services for over eight years. I have always found their level of service excellent and their work to a very high standard. I have used various lawyers at their firm for various businesses I have been involved with and have always had very positive experiences. I would highly recommend them.”
“John is very easy to talk to, he never makes you feel dumb, and never makes you feel like you are wasting his time for asking questions. He explains everything very clearly, every time. John's support staff are also very efficient and so easy to deal with. No detail is missed when dealing with them. My husband and I are fans of them all :)”
“I can't speak highly enough of Jenny. She got everything done in a timely manner and when my ex-husband threw a spanner in the works at the eleventh hour she got the required documentation to his lawyers and settlement back on track.”
“To Michael Robinson – I wanted to thank you and your colleagues for many years of excellent service to the Bank. You have an outstanding business that has proved to be one of the most reliable and ethical businesses that Collections have dealt with in the almost 9 years I was with the Bank.”
“I have struggled with different legal firms over the years, but over the past few years I have engaged with Turner Hopkins with various requirements from personal relating to wills, family trust, property settlements and contracts through to commercial engagements including employment advice, commercial lease agreements and general legal advice. I have engaged with a number of the people in the firm and always found them professional, punctual in their responses and very sound in the advice provided.”